Enter your email to subscribe

Monday, March 30, 2020

What Can Empowerment Self-Defense Lessons Offer Us During a Pandemic?

Sister IMPACT Chapter Prepare in NYC offers insights into "What Can Empowerment Self-Defense Lessons Offer Us During a Pandemic" and how protecting public health is a form of self-defense because it keeps us all safer.
  • Safer physical boundaries might be the highest expression of love as we heed the call to implement social distancing measures
  • Verbal and physical boundary-setting is a life skill for a variety of challenging situations
  • Flattening the curve to slow the spread, protect the most vulnerable, and to ensure that our healthcare workers and institutions can respond at capacity, requires each of us to enact and sustain a new set of boundaries in the interest of public health.
In the full blog, Prepare identifies IMPACT Core Principles and how they apply to physical distancing and COVID-19. 

You can find the full blog HERE.

Thank you, Prepare!

Monday, March 23, 2020

Say Something Superhero

Say Something Superhero Field Guide: A Manual for Eliminating Interpersonal Violence is a project of Safe Passage, Inc. in Northhampton MA which draws upon the anti-violence work of Lynne Marie Wanamaker, ESD Instructor and co-founder of the Empowerment Self-Defense Alliance (ESDA).

It can be awkward being a "Say Something Superhero," that is, bringing attention to behavior  (and by doing so to yourself) that you would like to see changed. Check out the manual for details (link above) but here are some highlights:
  • Know that you can make a difference
  • Acknowledge the awkward
  • Know your objective
  • People are watching
  • Expect feelings
  • Remember: You didn't invite the icky
  • Connect with like-minded others

Friday, March 13, 2020

IMPACT Chicago Response to Coronavirus

Anything in italics below indicates updated information since we first published this post.

We continue to monitor the spread of COVID-19 and are keeping a close eye on official information and guidance from the CDC, the State of Illinois, and the City of Chicago. We are committed to providing a safe space for participants and staff in our programs. As of now, IMPACT programs and workshops have been canceled through April 21 when public schools are currently expected to resume. As official information and guidelines are updated and affect our program offerings, we will send updates to program participants and to our entire community via email, on our website, and through our Facebook page.

If you have any questions, please contact us at info@impactchicago.org or send us a message via Facebook  and your inquiry will be routed to the best person to answer your question.

Additional Resources from Chicago Department of Public Health:
What you need to know about COVID-19 (English, Spanish, Simplified Chinese)
What to do if you are sick with COVID-19 (English, Spanish, Simplified Chinese)
Stop the Spread of Germs Poster (English, Spanish, Simplified Chinese)
Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Poster (English, Spanish)

Monday, March 9, 2020

Gender Inclusivity at IMPACT Chicago

IMPACT celebrates diverse gender identities and expressions, and affirms the rights of people of all genders to feel safe and respected. Our instructor team includes people who identify as women, men, and non-binary. While we are continually working to improve the inclusiveness of our programming, there are also limitations of some of our current courses and aspects that may not feel like a good fit for everyone. You can find specifics about our various programs HERE.

Monday, March 2, 2020

Addressing Stereotypes and Social Inequalities in the Self-Defense Classroom

A couple of years ago, I met a woman in a professional context for the first time who, after learning that I live on the South Side of Chicago, responded that she never goes there. “Aren’t you scared?” she asked, not waiting for an answer, before telling me that if she has to pass through the South Side, she goes by car. And, if it’s dark, she said, she doesn’t stop at red lights. “I figure if the cops pull me over, they’ll understand.”
I felt conflicting urges. Part of me, an indignant and incredulous part, wanted to argue, to draw attention to all the riches the South Side has to offer that she was missing. I had done this a thousand times before in similar conversations. On the other hand, I was also weary of this kind of casual racism. I wanted to simply shake her by the shoulders and make her see that the invisible walls that divide our city, one of the most segregated in the country, shouldn’t be respected. Those walls have been built, year after dreary year, by racist policies and appalling structural violence, and they have been fortified by the city’s residents. I wanted to upend her fortress mentality—one that separates “good” neighborhoods from “bad” neighborhoods—and all the fears that come with it. In the end, I didn’t do any of these things. Now I can’t even remember how the conversation ended, but it did, and quickly. It was not a learning moment for either of us; we both simply moved on, choosing to put our respective energies into a better interaction.
It is not uncommon in self-defense classes to encounter a version of the question: “what should I do if I end up in the wrong neighborhood?” The student’s feeling about what is “wrong”--about places and, inevitably, the people in them--reflects the same atmosphere of racialized fear that created our cities. Biased “commonsense,” in this case, may come to feel like intuition. What’s more, this kind of question is an anxious one. It seeks the false stability of a rule: “don’t be out after dark in X neighborhood, city, or country;” “don’t take public transportation;” or, incredibly, “don’t stop at red lights at night.” So, on one hand, the premise is not something that people committed to creating a better urban future would want to endorse by not refuting. And, on the other hand, the answer that it seeks—a rule of behavior based on fear—is both ineffective and antithetical to the broader goals of empowerment self-defense. What is an instructor to do?
One way to reorient the student, to begin from a different starting point, is simply not to repeat the language of “bad” and “good” neighborhoods. The goal of empowerment self-defense is to encourage people to participate in their own lives to the fullest and to expand their horizons. That, by definition, always involves embracing unfamiliar experiences. Language that recreates an atmosphere of fear curtails all of that rich possibility. Moreover, fear of what’s “out there” shouldn’t obscure what is closer to home. We know that gender-based violence most often happens in quotidian settings with people who are known to the target. Quickly shifting the starting point with both language and information can lay the groundwork for a deeper discussion.
              For over 30 years, IMPACT Chicago has grappled with how to communicate that stereotypes make people less safe while also adding to students’ self-defense toolkits. In the early days, lead instructors addressed the issue when setting up verbal scenarios for the first time or when students asked questions about “bad” neighborhoods. To minimize shaming students who said "wrong" or "bad" neighborhoods and to stress its importance, about 15 years ago lead instructors began to integrate their comments into the course introduction. I asked Chicago IMPACT instructor Rachel Marro to share how this is addressed in programs: "When teaching how to assess potential risk and danger, we emphasize that we get the most accurate information from someone's behavior and their response to our boundaries. Indicators like someone's clothing, language, or which neighborhood they're from do not give us information about their intentions. Reorienting ourselves to pay attention to behavioral red flags can help reduce fear about circumstances that may not actually be threatening, allowing us to engage in the world more freely. Simultaneously, it can help us pay attention to dynamics that may be unhealthy or threatening in circumstances where we've been taught to ignore those red flags-- in particular, with people who are familiar or similar to us."
This commitment to focusing on behavior and not stereotypes is reflected in IMPACT Chicago policy about suited instructor characters. It has long been the policy of IMPACT Chicago that suited instructors do not play characters outside of their own racial/ethnic affiliation.
Empowerment self-defense is a powerful method of individual transformation. Participants can begin to relax their grip on patterns of fear that they have learned over the years as they gain confidence in their bodies and in their voices. They can reenter the world each day with a greater sense of power and purpose. But empowerment self-defense also entails a commitment to creating networks of support among all people who are at risk for or have experienced gender-based violence. It is a social affirmation, one that recognizes that the problem itself does not discriminate and that the best response will crisscross the borders that otherwise divide us.
Priya Nelson
IMPACT Chicago Volunteer and Workshop Leader

Monday, February 24, 2020

How A Self-Defense Program Made Me A Better Therapist: Part 2: Using My Body

"Your power is in your lower body, use it!” yelled my instructor as a man laid on top of me holding my wrists at my sides. His body weight pushed me into the mat, and I could barely move. I took a breath, then flipped him onto his back and kicked him repeatedly in the head. Women were screaming and clapping as he put his hands on his head, a sign of defeat.

At 34 years old, I completed IMPACT’s Core Program, and it was the first time I was given “permission” to physically defend myself. I was saddened by the realization that I needed permission. Why would I need someone’s permission to keep myself safe? With some self-reflection and a good therapist, I made a discovery. My parents never defended themselves; they both froze whenever they were physically or emotionally threatened. Moreover, teachers, daycare providers, and community members taught me that girls should ignore those who physically assault them. I can still hear their lessons: “Just ignore them,” “You’ll just make it worse,” and “Don’t give them a reason to hurt you worse.” Sadly, statistics indicate that the opposite is true. People who seek to harm others target those who appear as if they won’t fight back. Simply put, if an assailant thinks you’ll fight back, they are more likely to leave you alone and look for another target. You’re just not worth the trouble. Have I been unknowingly sending signals that I’m an easy target? Yes, I had been.

I gradually learned to give myself permission to use my body to protect myself and I began to physically assert myself in my life. I perfected my walk - fast paced, shoulders back, and not hesitant to look you in the eye. My walk communicates that I intend to fight back if threatened. I began walking around those who walk at a slower pace, instead of meekly walking behind them. I started pushing my chest out while sitting and I noticed how empowering it felt to take up space. A year later I completed an advanced IMPACT program called Defense Against an Armed Rapist, as I realized that feeling comfortable using my body to defend myself is something that may never come automatically, but is something that I need to practice continually.  

My experiences helped me integrate somatic interventions into my work as a trauma therapist. Like me, my clients experience obstacles that make it difficult for them to use their bodies to protect themselves. Some clients believe that their bodies are unsafe, others were punished as children for protecting themselves, and some have biological trauma responses (Flight, Fight, Freeze, and Faun) that are stuck in their bodies. After IMPACT, I began focusing more on my clients’ physical reactions. I began encouraging clients to use their bodies in order to process trauma, physically comfort their inner child(ren), and learn to keep calm under stressful or threatening circumstances. I noticed that some clients started to make more progress as they integrated their bodies in treatment. 

In addition to trauma work, I applied somatic interventions to help clients improve their self-worth. One of my favorite interventions is to encourage clients to take actions in order to learn how to talk up space in the world. These actions can include taking the last open seat on a busy train, requiring a person to yield when walking directly toward them on a sidewalk, sitting in a confident posture, and taking up physical space in an enclosed setting such as a meeting or class (instead of trying to take up as little space as possible.) When we physically take up space in the world, we can change our brain chemistry and advance our own self-worth.  

The phrase “life changing” is admittedly cliche, yet there is no other way for me to describe my experience with IMPACT Chicago’s Self-Defense Programs. These programs taught me how to use my voice and body to carve out my rightful place in the world. And now, I pass this knowledge on to my clients.

This post was first published HERE. Reprinted with permission from Amanda Gregory.You can find Amanda Gregory's "How a Self-Defense Program Made Me a Better Trauma Therapist, Part 1: Finding My Voice" on the IMPACT Chicago blog HERE.

Amanda Ann Gregory is a psychotherapist, author, and speaker. She practices in Chicago and specializes in trauma, attachment, and anxiety treatment. She has written for Highlights Magazine, Addiction Professional, Adoption Today, Holistic Parenting, New Therapist, and Psychology Tomorrow.

Monday, February 17, 2020

Thank you to 2019 IMPACT Chicago Donors

Tuition and grants cover about 65% of the costs of the Core Program and IMPACT for Girls. Donations cover the rest. 

Thank you to all those who supported the IMPACT Chicago 2019 Fund Drive! Your generosity enables us to bring IMPACT self-defense training to more women and girls.
David & Janet Altman   
Lisa Amoroso & Phil Tracy          
Ellyn Bank         
Susan Blessing  
Bruce Brio
Sheila & Steve Carson   
Nancy Cohen    
Christina Collins
Dianne Costanzo    
Cyd Curtis Bates    Constanzo Fund
Judith Feilen-Kocsis       
Eileen Gelblat
Robyn Gray       
David Hart         
Margit & John Henderson          
Loretta Jackson
Valerie Jenkins 
Carol Jennings  
Pamela Jurkowski
John Kitley
Kasey Klipsch    
Ruth Lipschutz  
Jeff Lisse
Carmen Maso   
Margaret McGrath        
Deb Mier & Sheila Hickey
Shiyu & Anthony Nitsos
Clara Orban
Lauren Perez   
Liz Pfau  
Rachel Pildis      
Lisa Pines
Don & Judy Rosedale    In honor of Katie Skibbe
Roger Safian     
Tania Schusler  
Janette Scott     
Katie Skibbe      
Carole & Richard Spreitzer         
Martha Thompson      In honor of IMPACT Chicago Admin Team, Board, & Instructors   
Margaret Tomasik         
Caroline Villa    
Iris Waichler Costanzo Fund
Amelia Zimet    

Please let us know if we have made any errors. Thank you!

Monday, February 10, 2020

Rape, Recovery, Resilience

I was violently sexually assaulted by an ex-boyfriend of mine my freshman year of college. We had been best friends for three years before we dated, and after we broke up, we had pledged to go back to being close friends. When I decided to visit a group of high school friends on spring break, and he happened to be there, this boy who I thought I could trust went on to strangle and force me to perform sexual acts on him. Something in me shattered that night, and from that point on I was ruled by fear. 

It took me months to share what had happened to me with my family, and even with their love and support I could no longer conjure any self-love. I left college and returned home to face the trauma I had incurred. I lived with my grandma and spent my time cooking, reading, and swimming with her, as well as introspecting into my turbulent headspace. With intense, consistent effort, I was able to let go of the anger and hurt I felt because of my ex-boyfriend, and forgive him for what he did to me. (I want to emphasize here that it was essential for me to be as magnanimous as I could!) My forgiveness allowed me to shed my aggressive and hateful emotions, and construct in its vestiges a burgeoning personal security and love. 

Even though I began building up a strong self-confidence, I was still scared of men. A conversation with my dad where I disclosed that I was considering buying a knife and pepper spray led to a discussion at dinner that inspired my step-mom, Meg (I call Meggie), to research the offerings for a women’s self defense course in the Chicago area. The next time I saw her, she told me about the IMPACT Core Program, a three day women’s self defense intensive. She said that she was brought to tears when she watched videos of the Program, and wondered if I wanted to take it with her. I replied an enthusiastic “yes!” without hesitation.

On Friday, April 11th, me and Meggie parked our blue Volvo station wagon on the west side of Ebeneazer Lutheran Church. It took us a couple tries to find the right entrance, but we eventually hit the black button next to a heavy, wooden door and were buzzed inside. Through another wooden door and up a wooden staircase we went, and we found ourselves welcomed by smiling women instructing us to check in and make a name tag. The room we were situated in was a long rectangular space, with a painting of Jesus on one end of the wall. 

Now I am not one to feel awkward, however in this moment I started to feel nervous, awkward, and uncomfortable.Would I be ostracized for being raped? Was it too soon to take a course like this, after my experience?Am I capable of defending myself?As the door buzzed and as fourteen other female faces, old and young, filled the room, my anticipation grew. Then the lead teacher beckoned us all over to the side of the room with Jesus, where the floor was covered in blue gymnastics mats. We sat in a circle, and within the next twenty minutes my awkward feeling completely disappeared. Right off of the bat, Margaret and the other teachers fostered a safe, inclusive environment where all of us were able to freely share our thoughts and emotions. 

And so I began to learn something I had not been taught before. I learned that the strength of a woman’s body lies in her hips, and I practiced playing to these strengths to protect myself from an assailant. I learned how to operate under adrenaline, and fight for my life. And this is where my emotional transformation occurred: by learning how to fight for my life, and then by fighting using my full force, I had to decide that my life was worth fighting for. When I looked my assailant in the face, called him by my ex-boyfriend’s name, and delivered kick after unforgiving kick, I overcame my fear. Not only did my physical self defense skills evolve, so did my verbal boundary setting skills. As my kicks got stronger, my voice got louder. Now when I tell someone not to touch me, there is power behind my words. One of the most empowering aspects of this program was my peers. During each of my fights, I could hear them cheering me on, encouraging me to be brave. No matter our body type, ethnicity, or age, we all wholeheartedly supported one another. After each fight, we sat in a circle to debrief and express our reactions. In these circles I felt listened to, understood, and like I was not alone in my experience. 

Because of IMPACT I no longer let fear control me, and this has changed my life. I feel more free and empowered by my identity as an independent woman. I do not feel held back by my past, and instead I am a strong advocate for women’s rights and equality in my everyday life. Nine months later, I am successfully setting and enforcing boundaries with men. When I am walking alone in unfamiliar places, I replay my learned self-defense techniques, just in case. Most importantly, I live each day as Emilia, unapologetically.
Emilia Donenberg Smith
IMPACT Chicago graduate

Monday, February 3, 2020

How a Self-Defense Program Made Me a Better Trauma Therapist, Part 1: Finding My Voice

I spoke to my “attempted rapist” after I’d landed multiple kicks to his face and groin. I confessed to him—an instructor acting as an assailant— that I fear raising my voice in public because I’m afraid to appear rude, dramatic, or “crazy.” I had the heartbreaking realization that I’d rather risk being harmed than offend someone.

Two years ago, I completed IMPACT Chicago’s Core Program, where “participants learn and practice a range of tools and strategies to increase their choices when faced with uncomfortable, intrusive, or dangerous situations.” I’d recently moved to Chicago from a small town in Missouri, so I planned to take a simple self-defense class in order to feel more confident walking alone at night. Instead of a simple class, I found myself in the midst of a life changing experience. 

As a trauma therapist, my voice is a valuable tool. I use my voice to foster safety, connection, acceptance, and growth. I’ve spent years teaching my clients how to create and communicate healthy boundaries designed to keep them safe. Yet, I focused too much on words - which is only one part of using one’s voice. IMPACT taught me the importance of expressing intent by focusing on the volume and tone of one’s voice. I learned that I can use the perfect words, but if my expression doesn’t match my intent, my message will not be effectively conveyed. There is a noticeable difference between the phrases: “Stand back” and “STAND BACK!” Same words, different meaning. To feel comfortable using my voice in order to promote my safety, I needed to address the obstacles that had been in my way. 

There are many reasons why people are hesitant to use a heightened volume and tone of voice in public to promote their safety. The most common obstacles that I’ve seen from my clients are trauma, anxiety, sexism, racism, a lack of trust in the legal system/law enforcement, and low self-worth. I discovered that my own obstacles were sexism and trauma. Society taught me that a woman who yells, regardless of the reason, is unstable. So, having internalized societal expectations, I almost never raised my voice. In addition, my parents taught me that yelling and/or a firm tone of voice is a warning from someone who is planning to harm you. Thus, my trauma response is to not yell or sound firm so that I don’t harm anyone or give them the impression that I will. IMPACT taught me how to yell and be firm by having me repeatedly practice yelling boundary-setting phrases with my peers. It was extremely uncomfortable, and at times I froze up and couldn’t speak. But, the more I yelled, the more comfortable I felt using my voice. 

After IMPACT, I began to place less focus on my client's words and greater emphasis on their vocal expressions. I started encouraging my clients to practice using their voices during their therapy sessions. These interventions consisted of role playing, desensitization behavioral exercises, EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing), and somatic experiencing. One of my favorite exercises is having clients scream a neutral word in session, then in public. They chose a word that’s not threatening, offensive, or one that could be perceived as indicating an emergency. Words such as, “SWEATERS!,” “TACOS!,” or (because my practice is based in Chicago) “COLD!” This exercise has helped my clients not only to practice using a loud voice and firm tone in public, but it desensitizes them to any anticipated negative consequences associated with using their voice. Yes, people may judge them or stare at them. But, there usually aren’t any significant consequences and this intervention can help clients become more adept at using their voices to protect themselves.

I learned that the more that I’m able to use my voice, the more my clients feel safe to use theirs. 

This post was first published HERE. Reprinted with permission from Amanda Gregory.

Amanda Ann Gregory is a psychotherapist, author, and speaker. She practices in Chicago and specializes in trauma, attachment, and anxiety treatment. She has written for Highlights Magazine, Addiction Professional, Adoption Today, Holistic Parenting, New Therapist, and Psychology Tomorrow.

Monday, January 27, 2020

Shout Out to 2019 IMPACT Chicago Volunteers

Thank you to all the volunteers who contribute to IMPACT Chicago: Admin Team, Board Members, Class Assistants, Instructor out-of-class time, Social Media, What is IMPACT facilitators, and so much more! Below are the many people who have volunteered for IMPACT in 2019. If we have inadvertently left you off the list, please let us know.
Admin Team
Lisa Amoroso
Tara Brinkman*
AC Christensen
Laura Dini*
Kathleen Williamsen*
Amy Harmon*
Mindy Hilt*
Rehana Manejwala
Katie Skibbe
Martha Thompson

Janette Scott, outgoing chair
Lisa Amoroso
Bruce Brio
Sheila Hickey
Deb Mier
Robin Mina
Katie Skibbe
Martha Thompson
Incoming board members
Tara Brinkman
Denise Loyd

Class Assistants
Allison O'Neill
Amy E. Harmon
Bianka Hardin
Cameron Schwartz
Courtney Henderson
Dana Dunham
Deb Mier
Elizabeth West
Janette Scott
Kristen Reid
Madison Rieck
Maureen D. Barradas
Meghan Hammond
Michelle Trudel
Priya Nelson
Rehana Manejwala
Robin Mina
Tania Schusler
Veronica Silva

Rob Babcock*
Joe Bianco
Bruce Brio (retired)
AC Christensen*
Dominic Conti
Katie Skibbe*
Rachel Marro*
Mark Nessel*
Ben Ruiz*
Martha Thompson*
Margaret Vimont*
Nat Wilson*

Social Media
Arden Austin
Dana Dunham
Rachel Marro
Kim Ruhana
Maple Walker
Martha Thompson

What is IMPACT & Other
Araida Servellon
Becky Tupper
Chloe Pooler
Claire Anderson-Ramos
Ellyn Bank
Emilia Donenberg Smith
Hayley Beck
Maple Walker
Sarah Steinbach

Amy Harmon*
Lisa Amoroso
Nate Tracy-Amoroso

Workshop Leaders
Lisa Amoroso
Tara Brinkman*
Amy Harmon
Rachel Marro*
Deb Mier*
Priya Nelson
Katie Skibbe*
Martha Thompson, Trainer*
Michele Trudel
Margaret Vimont*
*Paid part-time staff who also volunteer

Monday, January 20, 2020

Revenge Porn is Illegal

Revenge porn has become a growing problem over the last several years. Photos that were once consensually sent within a relationship are then shared without permission from the sender, after a breakup to blackmail or seek revenge. Since 2014, revenge porn has been a criminal offense in the state of Illinois. 

Revenge porn is a class 4 felony (18 and up) with potential hefty fines and up to 2 ½ years probation. Victims can file civil suits for damages resulting in the offender paying hundreds of thousands of dollars.
If the victim is under the age of 18, the offender could face child pornography charges even if the offender received the photos during a romantic relationship. Anyone charged with this offense is required to be on the sex offender registry, along with high fines and prison time.
Maple Joy

#ImpactChicago #RevengePorn #IllinoisStateLaw  

Monday, January 13, 2020

Chalk Back: Challenging Street Harassment

To end street harassment, communities need to raise awareness and take action. Two current initiatives include:

An approach to raise awareness about street harassment: women around the world are chalking a catcall on the street where the catcall happened.

CASS (Collective Action for Safe Space), the city of Washington D.C.has developed a STOP campaign, identifying what witnesses of harassment can do.

Sidetrack--detract the perpetrator

Tell--text to report the incident

Observe--take notes and report

Postpone--after the incident, offer support

Monday, January 6, 2020

2020 New Illinois Laws Addressing Sexual Violence

New laws on consent, domestic violence, orders of protection, revenge porn, sexual aggression, sexual assault, sexual crimes, sexual harassment, and stalking went into effect in Illinois on January 1, 2020.

ELIMINATES STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES Public Act 101-130, House Bill 2135 Removes the statute of limitation for criminal sexual assault, aggravated criminal sexual assault, or aggravated criminal sexual abuse regardless of the age of the victim.

INCLUDING “CONSENT” IN SEX EDUCATION CONTENT Public Act 101-579, House Bill 3550 This legislation requires that course material and instruction in sex education for students in grades 6-12 must include an age-appropriate discussion on the meaning of consent to sexual activity. Under current law, students are not required to participate in sex education class, if the student’s parent or guardian objects to the class in writing so a student will only be subject to these new requirements if they take the sex education course.

PROTECTIONS AGAINST SEXUAL HARASSMENT Public Act 101-221, Senate Bill 75 Hotels and casinos must adopt anti-sexual harassment policies and make the utilization of a safety device available to employees. The law prohibits retaliation against an employee for using a safety device or making use of the protections of the anti-sexual harassment policy. The act limits the terms of employment agreements that restrict specified employee rights with respect to allegations of unlawful conduct. It further requires units of local government to add language to their sexual harassment policies including how to report allegations of sexual harassment by one elected official against another. The Department of Human Rights (DHR) must adopt a model sexual harassment training prevention clause.

TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS Public Act 101-529, Senate Bill 218 Sexual crimes such as predatory criminal sexual assault, sexual conduct by the use of force, criminal sexual assault, among others are added to the list of convictions of the parent requiring DCFS to request that the State’s Attorney file a petition or motion for termination of parental rights. The law adds sexual crimes to the presumption a parent is depraved and unfit for adopting.

PROTECTING THE IDENTITY/LOCATION OF ABUSE VICTIMS Public Act 101-211, Senate Bill 399 This legislation seeks to protect the privacy of domestic violence victims. It specifies that if a party states in the pleading or the affidavit that disclosure of an address would risk abuse or harm to the party or a family member, the address may be omitted from documents filed with the court. Under this bill, a party is not required to include in the pleading or affidavit a domestic violence safe house address or an address changed as a result of a protective order.

ADDRESSING SEXUALLY AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR BY INMATES Public Act 101-401, Senate Bill 416 A defendant being found guilty of an administrative infraction related to an act or acts of public indecency or sexual misconduct in a penal institution shall be considered a factor in aggravation in sentencing.

LEGAL RELIEF FOR VICTIMS OF ‘REVENGE PORN’ Public Act 101-556, Senate Bill 1507 When private sexual images are distributed without the depicted individual’s permission, the depicted individual may now sue the distributor for damages if the depicted person suffers harm from intentional dissemination of private sexual images without the depicted individual’s consent. Victims of ‘revenge porn’ may now sue for damages and use a pseudonym or the court may exclude or redact the plaintiff’s name and other identifying characteristics from all pleadings and documents filed.

EDUCATING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ON WORKPLACE PROTECTIONS Public Act 101-347, Senate Bill 1694 High schools may include in their curriculum a unit of instruction on workplace preparation that covers legal protections in the workplace, including but not limited to topics such as protection against sexual harassment and racial and other forms of discrimination. Local school boards may determine the minimum amount of instruction time.

INCLUDING SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE SCHOOL CODE Public Act 101-630, Senate Bill 1798 Each school district must create, maintain, and implement an age-appropriate policy on sexual harassment that must be posted on the school district’s website and included in the district’s student code of conduct handbook. 

DELAYING PUBLIC NOTICE OF ORDERS OF PROTECTION TO PROTECT VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE Public Act 101-255, House Bill 2309 When a judge grants an emergency stalking no contact order, a civil no contact order, or an emergency order of protection, the petition will not be publicly available until the petition is served on the accused individual. The change is designed to discourage respondents from contacting their petitioner from the moment any such order is granted.

PROTECTING THE PRIVACY OF HOME-BASED BUSINESS OWNERS Public Act 101-475, House Bill 2528 Victims of stalking and petitioners for an order of protection who operate a home-based business have a new protection in state law to shield their privacy, as this new law provides that a person operating a business under an assumed name at his or her personal residence may list the address of their local county clerk as the default agent for service of process to meet the publication requirements, if specific conditions are met. The law was inspired by a person whose stalker used the law requiring home-based businesses to have their address published in order to find and further victimize her.

Selected from a post by State Representative Charlie Meier on 2020 New Laws