The Invisible War: A Guide for Viewers

Thousand Waves and IMPACT Chicago are hosting a screening and discussion of the film The Invisible War, a film about rape and sexual assault in the military. Join us February 9, 4-6 pm, 1220 W. Belmont in Chicago.

The film conveys both the extent of sexual violence against women in the military and the general lack of response to women's reports.  Invisible War recommends that the military should take reports of violence against women seriously, by prosecuting rapists.  However, there are a number of disappointing aspects to the film that undermine an understanding of the violence the film itself purports to explain.  I am offering some questions to guide your viewing of the film, to help you draw out its strengths and place its disappointments in context.

1      Does the film represent the diversity of women in the military?

The group of women who compose the active-duty military force is more racially diverse than the male force. Nearly one-third (31%) of active-duty women are black compared with only 16% of men with active-duty women less likely to be white than active-duty men (53% vs. 71%). (Patten and Parker 2011).

The film starts out strong in its portrayal of multiple types of women in the film, in terms of race. Is this portrayal of a diverse military maintained?  This is an important question to address because, without significant attention to African-American women in the military, violence perpetrated against women of color is likely to be obscured, a common practice in US culture.  As you view the film, assess in what ways white womanhood is highlighted as worthy of defense and protection and ways in which women of color are excluded from such protections.  To what extent does the film address how intersections of gender and race affect patterns of rape and sexual violence?

2      Why do rape and sexual violence happen in the military?

With any social problem or issue, it is important to address the relationship between individual behavior and the circumstances within which the behavior occurs. Hierarchal organizations produce higher rates of violence—sexual, physical and psychological—against women and men within them and against women and men outside them.  At the heart of these hierarchies is a commitment to very rigid notions of masculine authority. Thus, fraternities, male team-sports athletes and the military produce far higher rates of sexual violence than what is found in the population as a whole. Additionally, social science research has found that aside from more traditional views toward gender relations, rapists are not psychologically different from men who don’t rape. 

As you watch the film, consider how the hierarchy of the military is addressed in placing rape and sexual violence in a broader context. To what extent does the film look at the culture and structure of the military and how it deals with rapists?  To what extent does the film focus on “bad” men who are psychologically deviant? In which ways does the film cultivate a “predator” approach to rape/sexual violence in the military? To what extent is the focus on serial rapists in the military, their self-selection into the military and their taking advantage of vulnerable women? To what extent is the issue of men’s sexual violence against women (and men) presented as a product of individual flaws embodied in the predator model and to what extent does it draw out the collective means through which sexual violence is produced? 

3      How does the film link violence against women and other forms of violence central to the military? 

The preparation for and carrying out of war-making upon people across the globe produces—perhaps requires—tremendous levels of violence upon individuals in the military with deleterious effects, only one of which is the havoc wreaked upon female service members.  Hardly a week goes by when there is not a news piece exploring the astronomical rates of suicide among or domestic violence by military veterans.  There are also many ways through which service members commit acts of violence, often in sexualized ways, against “enemy combatants” and civilians.  To what extent does the film connect violence against women in the military to women who are not in the military but who are near or on military bases or in nearby communities or the violence visited on "enemies,” including civilians? All of these forms of violence are linked to the masculinized structural hierarchies and culture of the military. Our understanding of next steps to reduce violence will be stronger, if we make those connections.

Framing the issue of sexual violence as one of predatory “bad men” serves to distance the problem—and ourselves—from the more fundamental issues at hand, which would require challenging militaristic logic and practices that characterize not only the military, but also our entire culture.   After viewing the film, think about ways that you can place rape and sexual assault in the military within the context of the US military and US culture. Think about what changes can be made to reduce violence against women in the military, women near military bases, women in the US and women globally.

Michael Armato

Associate Professor of Sociology and Women’s and Gender Studies

Northeastern Illinois University

For further reading on the links between masculinized culture and sexualized violence, as well as strategies for reducing violence, see the following online resources:

Men Can Stop Rape

mencanstoprape.org/

Men Stopping Violence

menstoppingviolence.org/

White Ribbon Campaign

whiteribbon.ca/

Reference

Patten, Eileen and Kim Parker. 2011. “Women in the U.S. Military: Growing Share, Distinctive Profile.” PEW Social and Demographic Trends. Web. Retrieved January 20, 2013 http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2011/12/women-in-the-military.pdf

Physical and Psychological Benefits of Self-Defense for Social Workers

Diane Long, member of NWMAF’s Self-Defense Leadership Committee

In July, the National Women’s Martial Arts Federation (NWMAF) held its annual Self-Defense Instructor’s Conference in Oberlin, Ohio. Martha Thompson, IMPACT Chicago Instructor, attended. The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Ohio Chapter offered CEUs for social workers who attended.  The NASW Illinois Chapter offers CEUS for social workers who take IMPACT.

Following is an excerpt of a personal narrative by Diane Long that highlights some of the benefits of self-defense for social work. Diane has taught sex-positive self-defense for over 20 years, locally, nationally and internationally.  Since 2003, she has worked as a French interpreter for psycho-educational groups and mental health services at The Center for Victims of Torture in Minnesota. Her full article appears in the NASW Ohio September-October newsletter

*****************************************************************************

For me, self-defense has always been associated with social services. I was first exposed to self-defense in a 2-hour workshop that was part of 40-hour advocacy training for Rape Crisis Services at a domestic violence shelter in Illinois. This training heightened my awareness of violence. The brief self-defense class offered as part of training gave me some practical tools to manage the increased fear and anxiety that came up as a result. The relationship was direct and immediate.  

Women’s self-defense programs developed in the same era as social service agencies like women’s shelters, with shared goals of reducing violence and providing critical services. It has always been a natural partnership. Language and practice have evolved over time, to reflect current trends and a growing awareness of how various forms of oppression intersect.  There has been a move from “victim” to “survivor”, encouraging the use of people-first language, developing terminology to describe interpersonal violence that is more inclusive and adapting curriculum to be relevant for diverse groups. Many self-defense teachers offer specialized programming geared towards youth, LGBTQ communities, people with special needs, seniors, etc. There is also a clear need for violence prevention programming for boys and men. Like social workers, self-defense teachers try to respond to the needs of the communities they serve. 

Social workers themselves can benefit from the tools self-defense offers in concrete ways. At this year’s NWMAF conference, Clara Porter, MSW, offered a class on Field and Office Safety. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ranks health care, including social work, the third most violent profession in terms of workplace violence.  Social workers need to make safety assessments of locations and situations and develop safety plans. They need to set and maintain clear boundaries with clients and program participants. Assertive communication and de-escalation skills are needed to address inappropriate or threatening behavior and also for day-to-day interactions in the workplace. In a way that is similar to Basic First Aid, simple and effective physical defense and containment skills increase a personal sense of security and confidence in one’s ability to respond in a crisis. This translates into more ease in daily life.

IMPACT Graduates Change the World One Person at a Time

What we experience in IMPACT class changes graduates in powerful yet intangible ways. The things we learn about ourselves become part of our daily lives and the transformation is gradual. It’s perceptible, but hard to pinpoint.

Some women want the sense of safety to travel solo. Others are sick of being pushed around at work. Others find they can’t effectively keep their sense of self with family. Some have been subjected to emotional and physical violence, and are looking for a way to heal. We have dug to the bottom of ourselves and have assembled all we could salvage. We’re not sure what shape to give what we’ve found. How do we materialize a new life, a new voice, and new perspectives?

 “Let’s start there,” says IMPACT ‘s philosophy. “Start where you are. What’s solid for you right now? Then build on your strengths.” When I returned to Chicago from living overseas a few years, I looked at all the ways I could make a difference in my community. How could I draw it in around me, in a way that’s true to me and to my beliefs? How could I put down roots again while being more enmeshed with people who would support me and also challenge me? IMPACT fundamentally provides a sense of openness and acceptance to each individual.

Many volunteers and instructors involved with IMPACT have either a formal or an intuitive understanding of social work concepts. This shows in IMPACT’s strength-based perspective, and how IMPACT helps people empower themselves. IMPACT isn’t social work per se, but there are many correlations. We espouse the method of non-violent communication, where we focus on how a statement is perceived rather than its possible intent and rebuttal. We strive to practice service leadership in assisting one another get our work done to benefit IMPACT’s mission.

The Core Program embodies everything a social-work group should be. Instructors build a space for each voice to be heard. In it, we connect to one another without expectations other than we will root for one another. We encourage one another when our courage or our stamina flag. We celebrate one another at the end of each fight, and at the end of the Core Program. Then we venture back into the world and into our own lives, to carry on the message of non-violence through containment.

Whether a macro-, big-picture person or a one-on-one, act-local person, IMPACT changes our thinking. To be given the space to experiment, to stretch, to wrestle with major issues from the past, or even to have a voice and be more assertive and feel less fear and go where we want – every woman is affected in one way or another by taking these classes, and spreads the change around her.
Submitted by AC Racette

Thank you to IMPACT Chicago 2012 Volunteers

IMPACT Chicago is, primarily, a volunteer-run organization. Thank you to all the volunteers who keep IMPACT going! Please let us know (volunteers@impactchicago.org) if we have, inadvertently, left your name off the list. Also, we are currently seeking volunteers for 2013. Join us!

Lisa Amoroso        Jeanette Andrews        Julie Aubry                Rob Babcock
Susan Barney         John Baumgardner       Angela Betancourt    Lili Betancourt
Ann Botz                Bruce Brio                   Amelia Cearlock       Courtney Childs
Dori Conn              Dianne Costanzo         Julie Curtis                Maureen Dunn
Leslie Eto              Sarah Follmer              Ellie Goldberg           Sarah Grove
Debborah Harp      Tashata Holbert           Jessi Holzman           Carol Jungman
Karla Kate              Katie Kramer              Danuta Kowalczyk     Rachel Kubacki
Milissa Kutyla       Naomi Love                 Jim Lucas                  Terry McDonough     
Deb Mier                Rose Naegele              Mark Nessel              Molly Norris
Colleen Norton      Jennifer Norton          Clara Orban                Jaimie Perez
Lisa Pines               AC Racette                  Mary Reynolds          Erika Rist
Ashley Ruiz            Ben Ruiz                      Rachel Rumentzas     Rebecca Rumentzas
Tracey Rumentzas  Arden Schuman           Deanna Shoss            Lena Singer
Agnieszka Skiba     Katie Skibbe               Valerie Schultz           Bree Swartz
Martha Thompson  Linda Tran                   Samantha Turner        Carrie Villa
Margaret Vimont    Amy Voege                 Kate Webster              Nat Wilson
Amy Winston