Stories are valuable to our understanding of ourselves and others. Michael Kass, founder of The Center of Story and Spirit, says that people who share their experiences have the ability to persuade people of the importance of an issue and inspire others to become involved, to donate, and to engage with an issue. Every organization has a story at its core and having people share stories is a very powerful way for an organization to get its message out. For instance, the stories of people who have experienced sexual violence and then take an IMPACT course are very powerful for motivating other survivors of violence and their supporters to consider IMPACT.
Kass says that if organizations use stories, they have an obligation for ethical storytelling--making sure that everyone has a shared understanding of not only the purpose of telling the story, but also in knowing where the story will be used, how it will be used, and how long it will be used. And that people must be informed before, during, and after sharing their story
For the IMPACT Chicago Core Program, IMPACT for Girls, or advanced courses, we let participants know the ways that we might use a quote or story that they share on the "What IMPACT means to me" form (e.g. research, facebook, blog) and participants give permission for us to use it or not and how they want to be identified if we have permission to use it. We have also had instances when a participant has given permission for us to use their quote or story and later decided they did not want to share their and we have removed it.
For more about ethical storytelling:
Navigating the Ethical Maze: Storytelling for Organizations Working with Vulnerable Populations. September 2017.
What does ethical storytelling have to do with GBV[gender-based violence]? Podcast with GBVIMS
Monday, September 10, 2018
Monday, September 3, 2018
Self-Defense and Trauma Healing: An Interactive Workshop for Those Who Work With Trauma Survivors
SAVE THE DATE
Self-Defense and Trauma Healing
SEPTEMBER 28, 2018 from 9:00am - Noon
Tickets: $75 and $20 for CEU Certificate
Instructors: Dr. Bianka Hardin & IMPACT Instructor Margaret Vimont, LCSW
CTC is partnering with IMPACT Chicago to host an experiential workshop for people who work with trauma survivors to learn how taking a self-defense course can be an addendum to treatment and support.
![]() |
| Margaret Vimont |
Participants will learn:
How and why to refer a client to self-defense training
Empowerment skills through verbal and physical boundary setting
How self-defense training can be an addendum to treatment
How to support a client who is taking a course
Participants will receive 3 CEUs provided by Centered Therapy Chicago.
Use: License # 268000085
Use: License # 268000085
Register here.
Monday, August 27, 2018
Beyond Protection: Perceived Threat, Criminalization, and Self-Defense
![]() |
| Jay O'Shea photo credit: Calvin Alagot |
As I approached the cash machine, another person walked up from
the opposite side, a few paces before us. A slim, white woman whose expensive
casual wear and designer sunglasses marked her as one of our Westside
neighborhood’s more affluent residents, she turned and looked at me instead of giving
her attention to the ATM. I offered a smile, acknowledging that she had reached
the cash machine first and had dibs on it. When she returned my smile with a
scowl, I expected the snappish disdain that well-off women in West LA so
commonly project toward other women, but not the question she asked.
“Can
you come back?” she said.
“Excuse
me?” I asked, assuming she meant “Can you step back?” That seemed peculiar
since I stood a good six feet away from her but I would have been willing to
accommodate the request.
“I need
to make a deposit,” she said.
“Go
ahead,” I said. “You were here first.”
“I said
I need to make a deposit. So you need to go and come back later.”
“What?”
Incredulous, I struggled for words. Finally, it kicked in and I understood what
she was asking, or rather demanding, of me.
“No,” I
added.
“You
know what?” she said. “Forget about it. OK, just forget it. I guess I’ll have
to wait.”
She stormed
past.
Grateful
for my IMPACT (and other empowerment self-defense training), I turned to my eight-year-old
daughter and said loudly, “OK, so this woman is looking for a confrontation and
wants it to be someone else’s fault. She may be dangerous and we need to be
prepared.” I knew that wasn’t it, not exactly, but I wanted to deflect her
implied accusation and make sure any bystanders knew she was the threat, not I.
Huffing,
crossing and uncrossing her arms, and making a show of endorsing her check at
distance of twenty yards from me, she pulled out her phone and stood watching
as I deposited my own check.
Perhaps
my tank top and skate shorts marked me, in her eyes, as poor. Maybe my baseball
cap and visible deltoids read as masculine. Or my dark hair, short, muscular
stature, and my daughter’s brown skin rendered us ethnically ambiguous in a
city whose largest “minority” is multi-racial. Whatever it was, it suggested to
her that I was a self-evident threat. In a weird leap of logic, my position as
threatening and socially inferior meant that it was my obligation to defer my
errand in order to protect her safety. Anything less than complete capitulation
confirmed my status as dangerous.
I had recently
attended a women’s self-defense conference where speakers pointed out that
white women’s ostensible right to protection exposes others, usually men of
color, to violence. People of various backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses (people
of color, working class people, the poor) have historically been seen as a
self-evident threat to elite white women. In the interest of protecting these
women, white men inflict violence on marginalized people, who are rendered
vulnerable precisely because they are seen as dangerous. Fear and entitlement
come together to create violence.
Middle-
and upper-class white women play into this system when they come to expect
protection, and come to associate people who seem different with threat.
Someone who lives at the intersection of different identities from my own (in
terms of race, immigration status, or gender expression) could have faced far
graver consequences than the social aggression I encountered at the ATM. The
criminalization of the poor, people of color, and those whose appearance or
behavior seems non-normative ultimately serves the needs not of women, white or
otherwise, but of a racist patriarchal system. Criminalization endangers the
lives and the safety of ordinary people and deprives the innocent of their
freedom. Criminalization is as much a threat to justice and equality as other
forms of violence.
This
woman’s actions can’t be, of course, considered effective self-defense. She
missed clues that might have signaled my true intentions: do muggers often
bring their children with them to an attack? Do they usually have their wallets
out and checks in hand? She was responding to a narrative she created – that
the person behind her in line showed up just to attack her – rather than the
actual circumstances: that more than one person had a check to deposit at an
ATM in a major city just after the close of business hours. Worse, in her
suspicion, she provoked a confrontation where none needed to happen.
Even
so, the flip side of acknowledging that we are responsible for our own safety
is realizing that we are responsible for how we interact with others. Just as women
need to let go of a desire to displace responsibility onto someone else, we
also are accountable to how we demand
safety. We are accountable to the social violence that continues in the associations
of criminality with difference. We do not have the right to criminalize the
ordinary actions of those who appear different from us in the interest of
safety.
As
self-defense practitioners and advocates we need to make explicit the
difference between safety and protection, between boundary setting and
criminalization, between intuition and stereotyping. We need to remind
ourselves, our students, and others that we are responsible for the conclusions
we come to, for the narratives we create in our minds, and the actions we take
in response.
Jay O'Shea
Author, martial artist, and
empowerment self-defense instructor, Jay (Janet)
O’Shea is the author of Risk,
Failure, Play: What Dance Reveals about Martial Arts Training. Recipient
of a UCLA Transdisciplinary Seed Grant to study the cognitive benefits of Filipino
Martial Arts training, she gave a TEDx Talk on competitive play. She is
Professor of World Arts and Cultures/Dance at UCLA.
Monday, August 20, 2018
If Your Partner is A Survivor
In "So Your Partner is a Survivor--Seven Ways to Be Supportive," Kaylee Wolfe reflects on ways to be supportive to a partner who is a survivor.
- Give your partner space to tell their story.
- Believe your partner.
- You are a supporter, not a "savior."
- They are still the same person they were before they told you their story.
- Consider asking about triggers and how you can help.
- Avoid taking things personally that are really about your partner's trauma
- Remember healing can be lifelong and non-linear
For Wolfe's thoughtful details, check out the full article in The Portland Phoenix here.
Monday, August 13, 2018
Thanks to All Who Made it Possible to Equip and Train Two New Suited Instructors
Thank you to everyone who helped us raise funds to equip & train two new suited instructors.
AC (in the white above) is the first new IMPACT Chicago suited instructor in over a decade. He has completed the co-teaching phase and will begin his supervised phase in August. Now that we can cover the expenses for his equipment and training, we can start the search for a second new suited instructor. Thank you!
- Thank you for all you do! Alexandra
- Way to go IMPACT for so many years of high quality, powerful training! Anonymous
- Worthy Cause. Thank you for your work. Anonymous
- Took this class years ago; glad to see it is still around. Athena
- Woohoo! Great cause! Debbie
- Keep up the good work! Dominic
- Took the class almost 30 years ago, carry it with me every day, tell people about it all the time. Dori
- Here's to your success!! Elizabeth
- Sending our love (and $) to IMPACT Chicago from the "Beauty Bites Beast" team! Ellen
- Impact changed my life. I want to help others benefit from Impact. Janet
- I took an IMPACT class in 1998 and it changed my life. I saw that I was strong and worth defending. The compassion and expertise of the suited instructors were instrumental in that transformation for me. Kellie
- Supporting IMPACT Chicago and, by extension, empowering women? Sounds good to me! Ken
- Thank you for ALL that you are doing to empower women. Best of luck! Kevin
- Thanks for providing such a great service. Kimberly
- This is so important. thank you and much love from Slovenia. Martina
- Love your guys. Michelle
- It's an honor to support the wonderful work of IMPACT Chicago. Nancy and Sarah
- Great organization! Noreen
- Keep up the good work! Pamela
- Thank you for this opportunity to contribute to this life changing and inspiring organization. The skills I have learned lives on in my life every day and spreads as I share my story and experience with others. I appreciate you all very much. Patti
- Proud to support such a great organization! Rachel
- Continue the great work! Sandria
- IMPACT changes lives. Thank you for all that you do. One day "no" will be enough, until then there is IMPACT. Shelley
- I tell EVERYONE about IMPACT. Attending the February Core Program was so inspiring and truly life changing. Thank you for all you do. Suzanne
It is not too late to donate!
You can donate via CauseVox
OR send a check to IMPACT Chicago, 4057 N. Damen Chicago IL 60618
Thank you!
Monday, August 6, 2018
Your Voice Has Power
I hadn’t expected to put my IMPACT training to use so soon, but I’m thankful the training prepared me to handle the unexpected and bolstered my confidence to use my voice as a powerful tool to fight back.
One week after completing the June 2018 Core Program, I was walking to the bus stop about 8:30 in the morning. A few blocks into my walk I wanted to take a selfie (to document my exercise). I lift my phone up and rotate the camera and see this man walking behind me. I make a mental note. I see a woman and little girl walking toward me and so I smile and say hi. The woman says something about it being so hot when she passes so I turn around to laugh and agree. I make sure to look at the man so he knows I see him. I slowed down my pace just to see if he would ever pass me. He doesn’t. He’s following me.
A few moments after reaching the bus stop, I notice the man is standing on the opposite corner, watching me. I turn away and look for the bus. I glance back over and he’s still standing there watching me, but then I hold my gaze and notice he has his penis out stroking himself. Broad daylight, busy intersection. I’ve never experienced this, but have heard many stories; stories of men exposing themselves on trains and buses, or in grocery stores. Like other women I know, no one ever really prepared me how to respond to something like this.
A different version of me - the pre-Impact training, less aware of my badassery version of me - likely would have turned away, ignoring this bold creep and waited for the bus. Or, walked to the Walgreens on the next corner and walked around buying time until he hopefully left. But not this day. This is not ok. I pull my phone up and take his picture. He sees me taking his picture of course, puts his junk away and starts walking across the street toward me. He’s talking loud like I did something wrong to him and I get loud back. “Don’t walk over here!” I yelled to him, but he continues to advance toward me.
He’s standing across from me, inches from my face, yelling, “Oh you don’t know me? You don’t know me?” Me: “No, I DON’T know you!” I’m loud enough to hopefully get the attention of another man walking up the block with a big dog. My thought is surely this big dog will get this man to leave. The man with the dog doesn’t say anything. He turns the corner and keeps walking.
Then, I hear a voice behind me on the other side of a gate. “Are you okay?” I tell the unseen bystander, “No I’m not, this dude just exposed himself to me!” The man behind the gate stepped in and I was able to leave the situation unharmed.
I was proud of myself for speaking up. It felt like a victory. But, it wasn’t enough. I kept thinking about other girls and women this young man will encounter. I probably wasn’t the first woman he’d exposed himself to. I may not be the last. I don’t want us to experience this. It doesn’t matter that he was across the street and didn’t put hands on me. He shouldn’t feel so comfortable to expose himself and intimidate me right on the street in a busy area. What would he do at night?
I decided to file a report with the police. According to the Illinois General Assembly, public indecency is a Class A misdemeanor. If committed on or within 500 feet of an elementary or secondary school grounds when children are present it becomes a Class 4 felony. It is a crime. However, as was my case, it is often not treated with the seriousness of more “major crimes” like homicide or rape. I was nearly laughed out of the police station and left feeling more angry and frustrated than fearful.
I put all of that energy into sharing my story on Facebook to alert my friends and also on my neighborhood’s Nextdoor.com listserv to alert the community. This may not be major to police, but so many women and girls have experienced something similar. This is major to us.
To my surprise, a detective contacted me two weeks later and the Chicago Police Department issued an official Community Alert that same day. The Alert was picked up and shared on local news and in my Alderman’s newsletter.
I saw something. I said something. And I kept saying it until I was heard. I’m thankful for IMPACT’s reminder that my voice is powerful enough to make change.
Sandria, June 2018 IMPACT Chicago Graduate
Encourage women in
your life to register for the Core Program
Sandria used her
powerful voice to defend herself. She continued to use her powerful voice
to create a safer community for others. Encourage someone you know to register
for an upcoming IMPACT Chicago Core Program.
Support IMPACT
Help ensure that more
women have the opportunity to take IMPACT training. If you believe in the work that IMPACT is doing and want us to be
able to continue, this is your moment. Please donate what
you can today.
Monday, July 23, 2018
Challenging Toxic Trauma within the Field of Trauma Treatment
![]() |
| Diane, Self-Defense & Sex Ed, 2018 NWMAF Special Training |
“Dr. Bessel van der Kolk, a best-selling author on trauma
whose research has attracted a worldwide following, has been fired from his job
over allegations that he bullied and denigrated employees at his renowned Trauma
Center.” Liz Kowalczyk, Boston Globe: March
7, 2018.
Reflection
on this news from Empowerment Self-Defense Instructor Diane Long:
My studies
with Bessel van der Kolk
I have studied with van der Kolk 3 times in
person, once for a two-day workshop in the Twin Cities – Minneapolis-Saint
Paul, once at an international conference and once in a 7-day intensive at
Kripalu Yoga Center called "Recovering the Body's Natural Rhythms through
Yoga and Play.” One of the reasons I chose Kripalu as a venue to study with him
was that I thought the combination with yoga would help to offset his somewhat
surly and reactive personal demeanor.
Gap between his written contributions to trauma and his teaching style
Gap between his written contributions to trauma and his teaching style
Even though van der Kolk has done a tremendous
amount to increase the credibility of alternative approaches to treating trauma
(e.g. Yoga, EMDR, Somatic Experiencing), I have thought of him as one of the
least trauma-informed instructors I have worked with, in terms of his actual
teaching. He was extremely chauvinistic - one of these guys that kind of makes
you wrong whenever you ask a question. He reminded me of my father - absolutely
brilliant, but socially prickly, insensitive, even hostile, especially if
challenged in any way. He also clearly treated female assistants with less
respect than the male ones. Sometimes it was subtle, but palpable.
One of my big issues at the Kripalu intensive was that he did not give any formal breaks during our training. So, if you wanted to pee, you would consistently have to miss a part of the presentation. It was oddly ironic for him to be teaching about trauma and reconnecting to body rhythms and yet fail to respect the body’s most basic biological needs. I pointed this out to him.
One of my big issues at the Kripalu intensive was that he did not give any formal breaks during our training. So, if you wanted to pee, you would consistently have to miss a part of the presentation. It was oddly ironic for him to be teaching about trauma and reconnecting to body rhythms and yet fail to respect the body’s most basic biological needs. I pointed this out to him.
Once, during a Power Point, he showed a piece of artwork by a child who had experienced severe abuse. The line drawing was graphic in nature, with phalluses aggressively dominating the screen. The use of the image served his point and it was valid for what he was talking about in terms of art therapy and common themes. However, he left the image on the screen (not deliberately, but unconsciously) while he moved on to talk about something else more positive in nature. I was pretty triggered and distracted as were many others I am sure, and it was hard to focus on what he was saying. At a lunch break, I pointed this oversight out to him (gently) and his response was something like, “Most of these people are therapists. It is good for them to be uncomfortable.” It was a classic defense pattern – a dismissive denial of any personal accountability, justification, and projection of blame. It was also sadly revelatory about his personal history. Even though he could acknowledge how some of his own trauma impacted his behavior, he could not integrate any critical feedback.
Experiences
with Other Experts
I have worked with several other well-known men in the field who have this same pattern. Many years ago, I attended a training where an audience member asked a presenter not to tell the graphic story of a young boy’s death which she knew from his book. He suggested she “cover her ears,” and mimicked the action of covering his ears in a kind of infantilizing tone, and then launched into the story. A few years ago, I was asked not to return to an Advanced SE training where I was an assistant because I expressed anger and disappointment (though it was behind the scenes) when an instructor was unwilling to address concerns about the physical comfort of participants and questions about a lack of racial diversity in training. He was dismissive and not open to feedback in ways that were similar to van der Kolk. His dismissive nature was known, even expected and rationalized by those around him, and yet he is currently one of the most senior trainers in this particular modality for treating trauma.
I have worked with several other well-known men in the field who have this same pattern. Many years ago, I attended a training where an audience member asked a presenter not to tell the graphic story of a young boy’s death which she knew from his book. He suggested she “cover her ears,” and mimicked the action of covering his ears in a kind of infantilizing tone, and then launched into the story. A few years ago, I was asked not to return to an Advanced SE training where I was an assistant because I expressed anger and disappointment (though it was behind the scenes) when an instructor was unwilling to address concerns about the physical comfort of participants and questions about a lack of racial diversity in training. He was dismissive and not open to feedback in ways that were similar to van der Kolk. His dismissive nature was known, even expected and rationalized by those around him, and yet he is currently one of the most senior trainers in this particular modality for treating trauma.
What Happens When You Don’t Deal with Your Own Trauma
I wish I understood this piece of developmental
trauma more so I could better respond when I am confronted with it. At van der
Kolk’s intensive training, I questioned/challenged him about a few things like
the ones I mentioned above. Women kept thanking me in the bathroom for speaking
up. This seems to happen wherever I go. I speak up or ask for clarification
with male authority figures (thanks largely to the confidence and skills I have
gained through ESD) and women thank me in the bathroom. Again, this was
familiar to me in terms of family dynamics. I was the one who was sent to ask
my Dad for things like money, time or attention because he would tend to be
less volatile with me. So, even though people with these patterns come off like
real assholes, and it can feel uncomfortable, even unsafe to be around them, I
have compassion for them, wondering what kind of childhood trauma contributed
to these behaviors. I loved a man who was like this. Many of us probably did if
we had fathers in our lives. It is so ironic and sad that some of the men in
the field who have been the most visible in advocating and promoting effective
trauma treatment have often not dealt with their own traumas, which then get
reproduced within families, within education and in the workplace.
Compassion, Accountability and Healing
Compassion, Accountability and Healing
Please don’t think that my compassion in any
way excuses this type of behavior. Aggressive, demeaning behaviors should not
ever be tolerated. At the same time, rejecting the people who exhibit these
behaviors is tantamount to rejecting the shadow parts of our selves. These
behaviors are rooted in deep, deep insecurity, experiences of childhood abuse
and neglect and a lack of emotional resilience and empathy. These beliefs and
behaviors are all defenses designed to protect against wounds that call
desperately to be healed. We are all impacted. I feel urgency in finding ways
to interrupt these cycles. I yearn for restorative models.
I have less and less patience for male
"gurus" (or authority figures of any gender for that matter), who use
power and privilege in ways that belittle people or perpetuate and reinforce
authoritarian hierarchies or refuse to look at the effects of their own
behavior. Being queer/genderqueer definitely helps me have some distance and
perspective because I am not so directly invested in heteronormativity, which
often includes justifying and rationalizing men’s bad behavior and emotional
care-taking. At the same time, I have more compassion, almost strategically,
because abusive behavior is so widespread.
Toxic Masculinity and Disdain for Vulnerability
Toxic Masculinity and Disdain for Vulnerability
I feel the effects of this kind of toxic
masculinity, even in feminist martial arts community where there is sometimes a
“no pain, no gain” attitude, where having needs, particularly emotional needs -
for safety, comfort and belonging, - go unacknowledged, or are seen as a sign
of weakness, and where injury, illness or disability are seen as being “less
than” or burdensome. Sometimes, questioning a teacher’s beliefs or actions
(directly or indirectly) is perceived as a threat to existing authority.
Passivity, feeling helpless, or “being a victim” is still often judged, seen as
shameful, and so we distance ourselves from the “the victim role.” This disdain
for vulnerability can come through in our language and attitudes, sometimes
unconsciously. It often manifests as a lack of compassionate holding for our
own fears and feelings of inadequacy. These beliefs and behaviors affect the
collective field. None of us is immune from the oppressive effects of emotional
neglect. We are all wading through the same toxic sludge.
I started a long letter to Bessel van der Kolk
that I never finished and never sent. I actually wrote letters to all of these
men that I never sent. I think it is time to start writing again…
Diane Long
Empowerment Self-Defense Instructor,
Somatic Therapist
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Diane's comments were first published on the ESD Action Group Facebook Page.
Diane's comments were first published on the ESD Action Group Facebook Page.
Afterword:
I wrote this piece 4 months ago, just after news of van der
Kolk’s firing, feeling validated and emboldened. I was still healing from the
effects of being excluded from another trauma training for speaking up about a
teacher’s dismissive behavior. I was still carrying a lot of shame. Even though
I didn’t do anything wrong, I still blamed myself until a few weeks ago,
thinking that if only I had managed my anger differently, if only I had asked
for help, etc., things would have been different. I feel much more
vulnerability when advocating for myself than when I am advocating for others. When I am harmed or injured or ill, my “go to” place
is still the belief that I have done something wrong, that I am somehow
to blame. This is one of the ways that victim-blaming is still at work in my
life. When these kinds of things happen, it erodes my self-confidence. Blaming
myself, though painful, is self-protective. It is easier to manage than the
helplessness I feel around abuses of power. I tend to withdraw and it takes a
while to recover.
I
believe neglect has a similar dynamic. Neglect is a way to distance ourselves
from pain but we also distance ourselves from ourselves. This erodes our
ability to empathize. I am glad that more people are speaking out about these
issues so that we can begin to heal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






