Below I offer an analysis of IMPACT Chicago
using the Characteristics of White Supremacy Culture developed by Tema
Okun to consider the ways it is (and is not) an empowering culture. This
analysis was prompted by recent organizational discussions about if and how to
adopt an explicitly anti-racist mission statement. Thank you to Amy Amoroso,
Ellyn Bank, Amy Harmon, and Martha Thompson for their helpful input on this
analysis. I am writing from my perspective as a long-time volunteer with IMPACT
Chicago, not for the organization. [Editor’s note: see below.]
Culture of
Improvement (instead
of Perfectionism). IMPACT Chicago is forward-focused and seeks to continually
improve. In my experience, IMPACT Chicago people routinely adopt a
problem-solving mindset, rather than a blaming one. We are an organization that
is open to learning and to change. Mistakes as we learn are expected.
Realistic Planning
& Solid Decision-Making Processes (instead of Sense of Urgency). In numerous
ways, IMPACT does an effective job at planning realistically and making
decisions rationally. Examples include:
- Our grant proposals
do not over promise and allow the necessary time for partnering with
organizations to meet their needs. All of our grant work has been centered on
community groups. Their needs have been at the forefront.
- Our training
timelines recognize that building the level of quality we need takes repeated
experiences and time to internalize, reflect, and redo.
- Also, our shared
governance structure (board, instructors, admin) is designed to push us to
build consensus, although this can take more time.
In terms of areas for
improvement, examples include:
- Filling classes has
consistently put pressure on our decision-making and planning. The sense of
urgency around filling classes falls disproportionately on the shoulders of our
Registration Coordinator. We have shifted work to promote courses much earlier
and this is proving helpful.
- Many people feel
rushed because we are all doing this work on the margins of our lives. There is
no one who has IMPACT as their primary focus.
Call-In Culture (instead of
Defensiveness). IMPACT has done well creating a call-in culture through the
curriculum, in the following ways:
- the focus is on
front-loading principles to our students (e.g. a focus on behavior rather than
appearance to communicate an anti-racist stance).
- Feedback to
participants is given in a manner that is forward-focused (e.g., what they can
do next, rather than what they didn’t quite get).
- The instructor and
workshop leader teams regularly review feedback from participants and adapt our
programming to address concerns and make improvements.
- Our training
process requires those in training to receive large amounts of feedback and
incorporate it into their work.
In IMPACT Chicago,
behind-the-scenes organizational work is largely done by women. Given our
mission this is no surprise, but this pattern holds up across the
not-for-profit world. I believe we need to accurately represent who has done
the work, particularly when it is routine and unglamorous work. This work
should be visible and valued. Pointing this out can be mistaken for
defensiveness. In fact, this is an act of calling-in and I believe forms an
important part in the fight for equity.
When people propose
ideas without learning about what has been done or when people assume something
is not being done because they are not aware of it, I have personally
experienced defensiveness and have observed it in others. It is a challenge to
ask people who volunteer their labor to run the organization to continually
educate others about the work that is being done, when they could be keeping up
with that information independently (by participating in social media, reading
IMPACT’s blog, reading the eNews - to name a few). I have found it demoralizing
to hear suggestions to do something a certain way when that is how it is
already being done.
IMPACT tries to make
invisible work visible so that it can be appreciated. Our current culture is
one of appreciation within teams, but I believe we could improve appreciation
across teams.
Quality over Quantity (instead of Quantity
Over Quality). IMPACT Chicago has consistently chosen quality over quantity in
all our programs. Instructor and Workshop Leader Training is rigorous and
effective. Conflicts are handled with respect and with an eye toward
establishing a high-quality process (e.g., how to fix the process that may be
fueling the conflict).
Many Ways of Knowing (instead of Worship
of the Written Word). As a largely virtual organization except when courses are
taking place, IMPACT Chicago uses written policy, notes, and task tracking to
communicate. However, our training recognizes that “doing” is an irreplaceable
part of learning and our training is centered on “doing.” Experiences are
processed in conversation with feedback.
Democratic (instead of
Paternalism). Our organization chart is not hierarchical because we know that
each area (admin, board, instructors) has to step up to lead but always in
conversation and collaboration with the other parts. We could improve in terms
of balancing the workload across the teams. In the recent past, the board has
served solely as a sounding board without responsibility for fund-raising, board
development, financial oversight or other areas that could rightly sit with
them.
Both/And Thinking (instead of Either/Or
Thinking). Our problem-solving mindset helps us maintain “both/and thinking.”
We seek to understand and deal with complex situations, rather than simplifying
or minimizing. We step outside binary thinking in terms of gender, which is
important since we primarily are serving people who identify as women and girls
. The IMPACT Chicago’s “Yes And” campaign (inspired
by improv theater) reflects this approach.
Power Sharing (instead of Power
Hoarding). An ongoing struggle is finding people to share the power and the
work.
Embracing
Constructive Conflict
(instead of Fear of Open Conflict). We actively worked on this in the late
1990s and have continued to build our capacity for handling low level conflict
in a constructive way. Several prescriptive models (including an adaptation of
Rosenberg’s concept of Non-Violent Communication) have been used and help
people hold one another accountable for constructively handling conflict when
it arises and for reflecting upon what happened if things did not go smoothly.
Collectivism (instead of
Individualism). Our work is explicitly not about individuals, but about
community. Our instruction goes beyond “personal safety.” We do not talk about
sexual assault as a private problem or as something that operates at an
individual level. We are focused on violence prevention and community safety.
Teamwork is central to our curriculum. Cooperation is valued. We could invest
more in learning to work as part of a team following the model set by the
Instructor Team.
Sustainable (instead of Progress
is Bigger, More). Given that the organization is mostly volunteer-run, progress
has been defined as filling our existing programs rather than growing them.
Until we are able to offset the costs of our Core Programs, we will not be able
to achieve sustainability. To develop greater sustainability, we need to have
buy-in from across the organization for programming that is not currently being
fulfilled locally or nationally and which does not depend on our expensive and
longer length programs. Examples of offerings other than our longer programs
include, working with local high schools to deliver their self-defense units or
working with organizations serving people with disabilities to regularly offer
training to staff and clients.
Subjective/Contextual
(instead
of Objectivity). We teach tools, not rules and that context matters. Our
training emphasizes that a person’s experience is their own and we should not
impose our interpretation onto them. We may offer alternative views or provide
options for the future while affirming their reality. We are not bothered by
being uncomfortable and see it as an important part of growth.
The IMPACT Curriculum
has stood up well across cultures, in part due to our structurally- and
culturally-situated approach to empowerment-based self-defense. In addition,
our programs have been adapted to address different lived experiences (e.g.,
the IMPACT: Ability curriculum), and we are actively engaged in extending this
work (e.g., gender inclusivity). In addition, we collaborate with our workshop
clients to ensure we are meeting their needs. The tension here is always that
we have limited staff and volunteer capacity.
While we will
continue to improve our course content and scrutinize it closely, I believe
that our curriculum provides a solid foundation for being both explicitly
anti-racist and gender inclusive.
Discomfort (instead of Right to
Comfort). As noted above, we value discomfort. In our programs, we encourage
participants to embrace the unknown. Our work is not just about safety, it is
about freedom. In terms of our teamwork, we often take discomfort as a signal
that our process might not be heading us in a direction consistent with our
mission, that the task at hand might have to be rethought, or that the
interpersonal dynamics need some attention. We are comfortable with the idea
that discomfort may be due to a lack of familiarity and does not necessarily
need to be fixed.
While IMPACT Chicago has a solid foundation
of inclusive practices, there is, and always will be, more work to be done. As
with all organizations, the culture needs to be sustained through care and
attention to what work gets done and how that work gets done. Yes And!
--
Lisa Amoroso, July 2020
Reference: Okun, Tema, 2001, “White
Supremacy Culture,” in Dismantling Racism: A Workbook for Social Change
Groups, Eds: Kenneth Jones & Tema Okun, www.dismantlingracism.org.
Editor’s
Note: Lisa Amoroso has been a dedicated and effective volunteer for almost
thirty years. She has served in all three major leadership areas in IMPACT
Chicago (staff, board, and instruction) and in these many leadership positions
has been a sounding board and support for Martha Thompson, Director Emeritus
and currently Admin Team Co-Leader. Some of Lisa’s many contributions:
- Admin Team Co-Leader
2012-2020, website, database, development of standards, & so much more.
- Board Chair and Board
member
- Fund Drive creator
and coordinator, 1995-2020
- Class Assistant and
Mat Mover
- Workshop Leader, 2018-present
